Sweden’s Justice Minister has reportedly ordered legislation enforcement to ramp up seizures of unexplained crypto holdings—even with out direct proof of a criminal offense. The directive hinges on a controversial legislation that would redefine asset forfeiture within the digital age.
On July 4, Decrypt reported that Sweden’s Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer issued a proper name for legislation enforcement, tax authorities, and the nationwide Enforcement Authority to accentuate confiscations of crypto property suspected of being tied to illicit exercise.
The directive relies on a legislation handed final November that grants authorities sweeping powers to grab digital property, even with out definitive proof of prison conduct, if the homeowners can not adequately clarify their origins. Since its introduction, the legislation has already been used to grab $8.4 million in property, marking considered one of Europe’s most aggressive stances on unexplained wealth.
In line with the report, Strömmer emphasised the significance of bettering inter-agency coordination, notably when coping with high-value property like cryptocurrency, stating it was “time to turn up the pressure.”
Why Sweden is concentrating on crypto with aggressive seizure powers
Justice Minister Strömmer’s push seems to stem from mounting concern over digital property’ function in Sweden’s organized crime financial system.
A September 2024 report from Sweden’s Police Authority and Monetary Intelligence Unit discovered that some cryptocurrency exchanges perform as de facto cash laundering providers—facilitating the movement of drug cash, fraud proceeds, and different prison income. The report explicitly urged legislation enforcement to “increase its presence” on crypto buying and selling platforms to assist establish and dismantle such operations.
In the meantime, latest figures from the Bloomsbury Intelligence & Safety Institute estimate that roughly 62,000 people had been concerned in or linked to prison networks in Sweden as of 2024.
Whereas information on crypto-specific crime stays sparse, authorities cite the anonymity and cross-border capabilities of digital property as key enablers of organized crime. These considerations probably fueled Strömmer’s argument that Sweden’s asset forfeiture legal guidelines should evolve to match the realities of economic crime within the digital period.
Some of the vocal supporters of Strömmer’s crackdown is Sweden Democrat Dennis Dioukarev, a outstanding advocate for a nationwide Bitcoin reserve. Dioukarev argues that seized crypto, notably Bitcoin (BTC), ought to be transferred to Sweden’s central financial institution, the Riksbank, to construct a strategic reserve.
“Cryptocurrencies confiscated from criminals should be repurposed to strengthen Sweden’s financial position,” Dioukarev mentioned within the report, framing the transfer as a technique to flip crime-fighting right into a long-term financial asset.
Nonetheless, the federal government’s silence on what is going to really occur to confiscated crypto has raised questions. When pressed, Strömmer’s workplace declined to make clear whether or not seized property can be liquidated, held, or directed right into a nationwide reserve.
